Monthly Archives: February 2008

Cybersettle makes the case for resolving disputes online

Future ahead at CybersettleRichard Susskind, digital technology expert and legal visionary, once said, “The best way to predict the future is to invent it.”

That’s exactly what Charles Brofman did. He invented the future.

Brofman, a former trial lawyer, is the co-founder of Cybersettle, the world’s leading online claim settlement company. Cybersettle makes use of what is known as online dispute resolution (ODR), a kind of dispute resolution process that utilizes digital technology to settle claims quickly and economically.

In 1996, Brofman had the foresight and rare common sense to create Cybersettle. What sparked this vision? A situation familiar to any trial attorney or mediator who has wrestled with a case that just won’t settle:

Cybersettle grew out of a 1995 encounter between seasoned trial attorneys Charles Brofman and James Burchetta who were representing opposing sides in attempting to settle an insurance claim. Jim, who in this case was representing the plaintiff, had demanded tens of thousands of dollars more than the amount Charlie, the defense counsel, was willing to offer. Both parties were well aware of what amount would eventually settle this case, but neither wanted to compromise his bargaining position – so on to court they went.

In the courthouse, they agreed to secretly write down their bottom line numbers and hand them to a court clerk, who was instructed to give them a “thumbs-up” if they were within a few thousand dollars of each other. If the case didn’t settle, the clerk would destroy the papers and never reveal the figures. He flashed a “thumbs-up.” The amounts were within $1,000 of each other. They split the difference and settled the case within minutes.

Cybersettle was thus born of the desire to help lawyers and others accomplish what sometimes can feel like the impossible: get cases to settle fast and fairly.

So, how does Cybersettle work?

Cybersettle utilizes a patented automated, online, double-blind bid dispute resolution system which allows disputants to resolve claims quickly and confidentially. Optional telephone facilitation is also available when necessary to smooth out communication difficulties and keep settlement negotiations on track, or when parties are close and can benefit from the help of a skilled neutral.

The online service generates high-speed settlements by matching offers and demands. Once the process gets underway, disputants have three opportunities or rounds to settle a claim. One demand or offer is entered for each round; Cybersettle instantly compares the demands to the opposition’s corresponding offer. When the offer is greater than or equal to the opposition’s demand, the claim instantly settles.

Who uses Cybersettle? And why?

Cybersettle has many satisfied customers, as its case studies testify, and has assisted in almost 200,000 transactions, representing $1,457,299,751 in settlements to date, an impressive figure.

Among those who use Cybersettle are attorneys and other legal professionals; insurance carriers and claims professionals; third-party administrators and self-insureds; and government, including municipalities.

But why would they use Cybersettle?

New York City has 11.6 million reasons why. That’s the number of dollars the City saved during its first year using Cybersettle. Faced with a backlog of 40,000 cases, the City needed to take drastic steps. The first city to integrate Cybersettle into its settlement process, New York was able to settle 66% of its cases within 30 days, reduce its backlog significantly, and realize significant cost savings.

For its clients, Cybersettle is virtually a no-risk proposition. The double-blind bidding means that parties can submit their walk-away numbers without compromising their position. This means that there are none of the worries associated with making first offers or other pitfalls of face-to-face negotiation. Most importantly, parties don’t pay unless they settle. I’ll say that again. Parties don’t pay unless they settle. What’s not to love about a system like that?

Speed and 24/7 access — much like an ATM or your favorite convenience store — are other qualities that make Cybersettle so appealing. Trained phone facilitators are also available during normal business hours if parties need the extra nudge to cross the finish line.

Curious to find out how it works? You can take Cybersettle for a test drive.

Final thoughts

Incidentally, Brofman’s talent for predicting the future is not limited to digital technology. Not only did he see the future in ODR, but on a phone call with him back in January, he correctly predicted that the New England Patriots would play the New York Giants in the Super Bowl and that the Giants would win. This is one guy who’s skilled at looking ahead.

Interested in finding out more about Cybersettle? Visit Cybersettle’s web site. And if you’d like to learn more about the brave new world of technology-mediated dispute resolution, read “Settling It On the Web“, an article from the ABA Journal which provides an excellent introduction to ODR.

Human-robot disputes the future frontier for family mediation?

Human-robot relationshipsDavid Levy, artificial intelligence expert and author of Love and Sex with Robots (no, I’m not making that up), in a recent interview with Scientific American predicts that humans one day will marry robots.

One observation about the need for disagreement in relationships caught my attention:

[Journalist:] Would people really want a robot that agreed with everything you wanted or were completely predictable?

[Levy:] I do think there is often a need for friction in relationships. You wouldn’t actually want a robot that does everything you want. Most people might want robots that sometimes say, “I don’t really want to do that,” that rejects certain requests from time to time. So you could program that in, the level of disagreement you want.

Which leaves me wondering how those disagreements will be handled. Do you simply reboot your partner? (Be honest now — how many of you have wished you could do that?)

Secret to staying out of court? Improve customer service

Marvin Schuldiner, a commercial mediator and arbitrator who blogs at Sanns Mediation World of ADR, tells businesses how to avoid a lawsuit. While there’s no guarantee against ever getting sued, you can reduce the likelihood of litigation by doing something that shouldn’t be rocket science: treat customers right and respond promptly to complaints.

Schuldiner deconstructs and comments on a recent customer service nightmare to demonstrate how a missing $1,100 laptop led to the filing of a $54 million lawsuit. It’s well worth reading — as is the content overall on this informative ADR blog.

The peace symbol celebrates its 50th birthday

Wage peace and celebrate the 50th birthday of the peace symbolThe peace symbol — an enduring emblem of protest recognized around the world — celebrates its 50th birthday this year.

Visit the Happy Birthday Peace web site to learn what you can do to make love, not war.

Mandatory arbitration agreements unhealthy for patients

Two different sources — one approvingly, one not — report that a growing number of doctors are asking patients to enter into agreements to arbitrate malpractice claims and waive their right to trial by jury.

Both sources link to “Arbitration a growing trend in health care“, a story appearing earlier this month in the Philadelphia Inquirer :

Michael Cohen was handed an arbitration agreement when he visited his longtime primary-care doctor in Bucks County. Cohen said he was not the suing kind, but the thought of being asked to give up his right to sue “stopped me in my tracks.” He said no, and his doctor saw him anyway.

Then Hedy Cohen, who has had a kidney transplant, was mailed a similar form by a group of kidney specialists she planned to see for the first time. The form from Hypertension-Nephrology Associates in Willow Grove insisted on binding arbitration and said she would have to pay the doctors’ legal fees if she filed a complaint and lost.

Hedy Cohen said no and was told to find another nephrologist.

That was fine with Cohen, a nurse with a master’s degree in health-care administration. “I couldn’t have a relationship with this person because they had already set the tone,” she said. “We’re adversaries before we even know each other.”

You can count me in the camp that considers such agreements a really bad idea. Never mind all of the usual arguments against mandatory arbitration agreements — they go without saying. The chief problem I see is the message it conveys — it says plainly, “I care more about my own self-interest than I do about the quality of my relationship with my patients.” What impact does that have on a patient’s trust? What does it say about the physician’s priorities? His or her sense of duty to that patient? What does it convey about that physician’s commitment to providing good patient care — what is at bottom good customer service? It would tell me as a patient all I need to know — to seek medical care somewhere else.

What if instead a physician asked a patient to enter into a very different kind of understanding? An understanding premised on trust, mutual respect, and a willingness to communicate?

It’s not so far-fetched. Listen to “Medical Apologies“, which aired recently on Radio Boston. It describes what happens when health care professionals actually talk to patients when medical procedures go wrong. It means fewer lawsuits, not more, when doctors apologize to patients for medical errors. And it represents a healthier direction for the health care field and for patients than the mandatory arbitration trend.

Head of U.S. Office of ADR Services describes benefits of online dispute resolution

ODRIn an interview with Government Computer News, Daniel Rainey, Director of the Office of Alternative Dispute Resolution Services for the U.S. National Mediation Board, makes the case for online dispute resolution (ODR).

Rainey, an internationally recognized authority on ODR, explains how collaborative technology can be used to resolve disputes successfully while saving time and money, as well as to promote online brainstorming and negotiation, streamline the intake process, and facilitate the drafting of agreements once resolution has been reached.

Rainey also discusses the work and upcoming projects of the Interagency Alternative Dispute Resolution Working Group, created to coordinate, promote, and facilitate the effective use of ADR throughout the federal government.

Daniel Rainey | Online system takes a quick route to resolving disputes” is available at the Government Computer News site.

What pork chops and bicycles have in common at Blawg Review #147

Blawg Review #147 reveals link between pork chops and bicyclesRush Nigut at Rush on Business hosts Blawg Review #147. This week’s edition of Blawg Review celebrates RAGBRAI, the Register’s Annual Great Bicycle Ride Across Iowa, a seven-day ride across the Hawkeye State. Now in its 36th year, RAGBRAI is the longest, largest and oldest touring bicycle ride in the world — and also includes a hugely popular pork chop grill, conducted by Mr. Pork Chop himself who tours Iowa in a pig-shaped bus.

Blawg Review of course is the weekly review of the best in legal blogging, hosted each week by a different legal blogger. Like RAGBRAI, it’s a tasty treat you won’t want to miss.

(Photo credits: pig by Anka Draganski; bicycle by Michael Zacharzewski.)

What voters can learn from the field of negotiation

Negotiation skills for votersThroughout this election season here in the US, there’s been a lot of talk about the candidates and their skills in, or positions on, negotiating.

Barack Obama took heat for saying he’d talk with Iran, as Republican contenders insisted they wouldn’t negotiate with terrorists, while Hillary kept changing her mind whether she would or not.

Meanwhile from the mediation community we’ve heard Robert Benjamin’s views as a hard core negotiator on one of the candidates, countered by a deft parry from conflict management professor Darrell Puls.

With so much at stake here in the U.S. presidential elections — jobs, the economy, health care, foreign relations, national security, the war in Iraq, civil liberties, education, the environment, you name it — it’s surprising that no one’s talking about the negotiation skills of the one person who matters most here: the American voter. That’s the person we should be most concerned with, since it is this person who will ultimately determine (dodgy electronic voting machines and Florida recounts aside) who will occupy the White House in 2009.

What kind of negotiator is this person? How prepared are they for the negotiation in the voting booth? That’s what I want to know.

I therefore propose three negotiation tips for voters to aid them as they decide which political candidate to pull the lever for come November.

Negotiation Tip No. 1: Be prepared.

Many negotiators agree on the importance of preparation. The more you ask questions, the more you listen, the more you learn, the more you’ve taken time to understand the interests at stake and evaluate the options available, the better the position you’re in to negotiate. An election’s no different. Knowledge is power, both at the negotiation table and in the voting booth.

In fact, you owe it to yourself to seek your information from sources that are as reliable and as objective as possible. Forget what the candidates, your favorite radio station, or your Uncle Dave tell you. Visit sites like The Fact Checker, FactCheck.org, or PolitiFact.com to learn what the spin-doctors don’t want you to know. As The Who once said, “Won’t get fooled again.” Let that be your anthem.

Negotiation Tip No. 2: Watch out for cognitive biases.

As humans, we all fall prey to cognitive errors — the mistakes our minds commit as we make decisions or form judgments. In fact, here’s a whole list of them to guard against. In particular, watch out for confirmation bias — the tendency to seek out information that supports your position.

Negotiation Tip No. 3: Arm yourself against the weapons of influence.

In his classic work, Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, Robert Cialdini details our susceptibility to the manipulations of others. He warns of how easily we succumb to influence, what he calls the click, whirr of human behavior. Click, the behavioral trigger is activated. Whirr, we irresistibly respond. For example, researchers have documented how effective authority can be for influencing everything from consumer purchasing decisions (consider the controversy over Dr. Robert Jarvik’s endorsement of Lipitor) to support for a political candidate (think Chuck Norris or Oprah Winfrey).

For a description of the strategies of influence at work, Victoria Pynchon writing at Settle It Now Negotiation Blog lists six basic principles of persuasion that you may already be at the mercy of.

* * * * * * * * * *

With these three tips, you’ll be ready for anything that the pundits and the pols dish out. Just remember, even if you don’t believe in negotiating with terrorists, at least be willing to negotiate with yourself before you vote.

Get fantasy dispute resolution at SportsJudge.com

SportsJudge.comYou read that headline right.

No, we’re not talking about dispute resolution professionals mediating naked.

It’s actually dispute resolution for fantasy sports disputes. From the SportsJudge.com site:

In today’s high paced, intensely competitive world, the constant strive for professionalism in fantasy sports is hardly uncommon. Despite this, no one is perfect, and problems do occur. With that in mind, SportsJudge prides itself on providing the most avid and intense fantasy gamers with a dispute resolution method to make sure each and every problem eventually ends with a proper solution.

There’s even a SportsJudge blog.

Hat tip to odr.info for the link.

Radio station holds Valentine's Day contest to give away free divorce

Radio station gives away free divorce on Valentine’s DayOn Valentine’s Day, romance is in the air.

But not for Charleston, West Virginia radio station WKLC. It’s holding a Valentine’s Day contest to give away a free divorce to one lucky couple.

There’s just a couple of problems. That free divorce — surprise, surprise — doesn’t include the services of a divorce mediator. And it may not be so free — the winner of the contest instead will only get 10 free hours of an attorney’s time.

Ten hours may only be enough to just get you started — especially if you consider the study the Boston Law Collaborative conducted of 199 divorce cases. It found that for divorcing couples, “[m]ediation was by far the least expensive option, with a median cost of $6,600, compared to $19,723 for a collaborative divorce, $26,830 for settlements negotiated by rival lawyers, and $77,746 for full-scale litigation.”