From the monthly archives:

February 2007

One bad workplace appleAccording to the results of a study reported in the journal Research in Organizational Behavior, bad apples really do spoil it for their co-workers. This will come as no surprise to anyone who has ever shared a workspace with a negative personality.

The study, conducted by Will Felps, a Ph.D. candidate in management and organizational behavior, Professor Terence R. Mitchell, and graduate student Eliza Byington, all from the University of Washington Business School, examines the ways in which the negative behavior of proverbial “bad apples” can wreak havoc on a workplace. Unsurprisingly, bad apples undermine creativity and problem-solving, stymie learning, escalate conflict, distract co-workers from their tasks, destroy trust, and produce a host of other ill effects that no organization can afford to ignore.

The study was inspired by the experience of Felps’s wife with a bad apple in her own workplace:

Felps’ wife was unhappy at work and characterized the environment as cold and unfriendly. Then, she said, a funny thing happened. One of her co-workers who was particularly caustic and was always making fun of other people at the office came down with an illness that caused him to be away for several days.”And when he was gone, my wife said that the atmosphere of the office changed dramatically,” Felps said. “People started helping each other, playing classical music on their radios, and going out for drinks after work. But when he returned to the office, things returned to the unpleasant way they were. She hadn’t noticed this employee as being a very important person in the office before he came down with this illness but, upon observing the social atmosphere when he was gone, she came to believe that he had a profound and negative impact. He truly was the “bad apple” that spoiled the barrel.”

The study, “How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: Negative group members and dysfunctional groups“, is available (in PDF) at Will Felps’s web page.

{ 1 comment }

Developing cultural awareness in a global business worldFor many of us in the 21st century, the map of our business and social networks has radically changed. Once local or regional, those networks have become global, thanks to digital technology, which has transformed the geography of our professional and personal lives.

With these changes come challenges: what can we do to prepare ourselves to communicate effectively with our international contacts? How can we develop cultural awareness in a global age? From Pamela Slim at Escape from Cubicle Nation (along with comments from her readers) comes invaluable advice on “How not to be a cultural knucklehead in a global business world“.

(Now if only someone out there can help me communicate with my British husband.)

(Thanks to Golden Practices for the link.)

{ 1 comment }

Bob Sutton's The No Asshole RuleImagine for a moment that your house is infested with termites. You are desperate to find someone who can rid your home of these destructive pests once and for all.

Now imagine as you call the pest control services listed in your local phone directory that strong social taboos forbid you from actually using the word “termite” to describe your problem. You have no choice but to resort to awkward euphemisms and embarrassed silences as you attempt to explain to the professionals that your home is infested with, er, you-know-what.

That’s pretty much the problem that Bob Sutton confronts in his newly published book, The No Asshole Rule: Building a Civilized Workplace and Surviving One That Isn’t.

As a dispute resolution professional with a strong interest in the workplace, I have read more books and articles than I can possibly count on dealing with difficult people. While many of them are excellent, none of them has fully delivered the goods when it comes to the most toxic workplace problem there is.

That’s probably due to the fact that until now nobody has had the guts to name the problem for what it is. Thanks to Sutton, that’s all changed.

As Sutton explains in his introduction, no other word quite does the job:

When I encounter a mean-spirited person, the first thing I think is: “Wow, what an asshole!”

I bet you do, too. You might call such people bullies, creeps, jerks, weasels, tormentors, tyrants, serial slammers, despots, or unconstrained egomaniacs, but for me at least, asshole best captures the fear and loathing that I have for these nasty people.

And judging from the overwhelmingly response Sutton’s book has received, including the many people who have stepped forward to share stories of their own encounters with assholes (as well as from the excited reactions from the colleagues and friends to whom I introduced the book), Sutton’s dead right. “Asshole” taps into associations, memories, and emotions that lesser synonyms simply can’t.

(Which is why I have decided to use the word in both the title and body of this post. If I offend any of my readers, I apologize. It’s not a failure of either imagination or vocabulary; authenticity demands it. Besides, if I followed the example of other writers and replaced letters in the offending word with asterisks–A******–you and I would both know what I meant, and neither one of us would be fooled. The word is still there, hidden behind its typographical fig leaf.)

Despite being a slim volume (only 210 pages in length), this book is crammed with useful information and ideas, along with numerous real-life anecdotes which bring the text to memorable life. Sutton describes the behavior that sets assholes apart from the rest of us, including one factor that is always present: assholes tend to target those with less power or status, and provides a test to determine whether you might be one, too.

Sutton also provides a list of factors by which readers can gauge the TCA–”Total Cost of Assholes”–in their own companies to reveal the high cost in financial and human capital that assholes pose. And he offers wise counsel for implementing and enforcing a “no asshole” rule, including smart hiring strategies, and has tips on keeping your own inner asshole in check.

Mediators in particular will appreciate Sutton’s advice that organizations should “teach people how to fight”. He is clear that organizations should not “replace assholes” with “conflict-averse wimps” and emphasizes that friction can be good for organizations–it’s not the fact that you fight, it’s how you fight that matters. So long as disagreement and argumentation is constructive not demeaning, organizations, people, and ideas can all thrive.

Sutton recounts the experiences of organizations in teaching their members how to fight fairly. And he makes no bones about how difficult an undertaking this can be, demanding constant vigilance and a commitment to rigorous self-reflection. He acknowledges how “messy and difficult it can be to fight with other people over ideas without acting like an asshole”.

In fact, it is Sutton’s self-honesty that stands among this book’s greatest strengths. Throughout, Sutton is candid with readers as he recounts his struggles to confront and neutralize his own tendency to be an asshole–a struggle that any of us who are willing to admit that we can be assholes, too, can relate to.

This book is not without its flaws, although they are minor. The book is weakest when it offers advice to those who are targets of assholes. Victims of bullying behavior probably won’t be helped by mantras like “look for small wins” and “hope for the best; expect the worst”. And although Sutton does remind readers that quitting is always an option, it may not be possible for people in tough financial circumstances in a tight job market. Documenting the behavior, seeking help from human resources or higher level management, building a coalition with others who are affected to seek change as a group, and getting legal advice from an employment lawyer may be more realistic and productive courses of action for victims to pursue.

It’s also disappointing to see an entire chapter devoted to “The Virtues of Assholes”–these schmucks don’t need any encouragement. (And I can’t help but wonder whether the successful assholes he describes might have achieved even greater success had they used their powers–ambition, determination, vision–for good not evil.)

These minor quibbles aside, this book is an outstanding contribution to the large body of work on building effective workplaces. Its courage and honesty in confronting a problem that no one seems to want to name set it apart. Anyone who cares about building a civilized workplace–human resources professionals, workplace consultants, mediators, and others–will find value in its pages.

Even if they have to hide the cover in a plain brown wrapper.

{ 3 comments }

MassUMA Working Group seeks assistance from mediators in states which have adopted the UMAI am a member of the MassUMA Working Group, a committee which is exploring the possible adoption of the Uniform Mediation Act here in the Commonwealth.

We would be very interested in hearing from mediators in states which have adopted the UMA as to how it has affected your practice (if at all). We are especially interested in learning how it has impacted your description of the process to parties and/or their representatives, including privilege and exceptions to confidentiality. For example, do you hand out a copy of the statute to your clients? Provide a synopsis orally or in writing? Or simply ignore it? Has the UMA affected your practice in any other significant way?

All responses would be warmly received (and, of course, kept confidential!). By the way, you can see what our working group has accomplished so far and where we’re headed by visiting our web site at http://www.massuma.com/.

Please feel free of course to pass our request on to colleagues–the more widely we can disseminate this request, the more complete our investigation will be. Please e-mail your information to massuma@adrblogs.com.

Thank you for any assistance you can give us–it will be greatly appreciated by all.

{ 0 comments }

library booksThe most recent addition to the World Directory of ADR Blogs project is CResearch, the directory’s first blog devoted to conflict resolution research, news, and commentary.

Published by John Windmueller, Assistant Professor at the University of Baltimore’s Center for Negotiations and Conflict Management, CResearch was created to further discussions and information sharing between conflict resolution researchers and practitioners.

As John explains, “[W]here possible I’d like to see the division between practice and research blurred, with practitioners becoming more empowered and able to integrate research into their everyday work. Toward that, the site will share techniques, tools, and tips for practitioners interested in following their curiosity and bringing more rigorous evaluation and learning into their practice.”

I invite you to join me in welcoming John to the ADR blogosphere.

I’m always on the lookout for blogs to add to the World Directory of ADR Blogs‘ growing catalogue. If you wish to add your blog or someone else’s to the Directory, please let me know. It’s a commercial-free site, and there is no cost to be listed. The Directory has information on submitting your blog and submission guidelines.

{ 2 comments }

Blawg Review #94

February 5, 2007 Blawg Review

Welcome to Blawg Review #94–the “getting to yes” edition!
Many editions of Blawg Review are organized around a central, unifying theme, influenced by the focus of the host’s own work or an event or date that edition coincides with.
The theme of this one happens to be negotiation.
Why? I’m a mediator. And as a mediator, I help [...]

Read the full article →