Monthly Archives: July 2005

CONNECTICUT APPROVES THE USE OF ARBITRATION IN RESOLVING DIVORCE DISPUTES

Connecticut authorizes use of arbitration in divorce cases.The Waterbury, Connecticut Republican-American reports this morning that the Connecticut State legislature has passed legislation which authorizes the use of arbitration in divorce disputes.

The new law, which goes into effect on October 1, 2005, offers to couples going through divorce another alternative to litigation. The courts, however, still retain some powers of judicial oversight: a judge must determine that parties have entered arbitration voluntarily and assess whether the agreement to arbitrate is fair and equitable under the circumstances. Furthermore, only judges will continue to have the power to decide issues relating to the children, including child support, custody or visitation.

For the full text of the statute, click here.

For more Connecticut law and ADR resources, visit the web site for the Connecticut Bar Association, including its Alternative Dispute Resolution section, which offers a useful list of local, national, and international ADR links recommended by members of the ADR section and other contributors.

More than we bargained for: does gender matter in negotiation?

Does gender matter in negotiation?Chances are pretty good that if you live in the U.S. and own a TV, you’ve probably seen the Kia commercial which depicts a husband and wife’s visit to a car dealership.

The husband is seated inside a minivan with the salesman, while his wife stands outside several yards away, watching intently but unable to hear the conversation. As the husband motions with his hands in a forceful, assertive way, he says to the car salesman, “I need to gesture aggressively with my hands so my wife thinks I’m really working you over.”

The point seems to be that Kia’s prices are so low that there’s no need to negotiate. But as a result this means that the husband must pretend to hard-bargain as a face-saving measure so his wife thinks that it was his tough negotiating style that got them the great deal.

You don’t need to be a Freudian psychologist or a radical feminist to divine the meaning of messages popular culture delivers regarding negotiation, or the ways in which it reinforces the differences—perceived or real—between men and women in negotiating behavior.

The type of negotiating we see in this ad is what pop culture typically depicts—competitive, winner-take-all, zero-sum bargaining, rather than the interest-based, value-creating, win/win negotiation promoted by ADR practitioners.

It’s hard to miss the fact that the negotiation, such as it is, takes place between two men, while predictably the woman remains on the sidelines (with the baby stroller). The message is clear: negotiation is a man’s job. And anything besides hard (racy pun intended) bargaining just isn’t manly. (Interest-based negotiation is for girly-men.)

Normally I tend to tune ads out (in fact, in my opinion, it’s why the “mute” button on the TV remote control was invented). But this ad caught my attention because of several articles I just finished reading on negotiation, which I invite you to ponder.

The first of these is “Legal Negotiation in Popular Culture: What Are We Bargaining For?”, by Carrie Menkel-Meadow, Director of the Georgetown-Hewlett Program in Conflict Resolution and Legal Problem Solving at Georgetown University Law Center.

This article, although not focusing on gender, explores the ways in which popular culture depicts legal negotiation and what these depictions reveal about our culture, including its consumers and creators. (Unsurprisingly legal negotiations are usually portrayed as high-conflict, win-lose battles between adversaries, rather than as creative, value-creating processes which result in greater gain for all participants.) It’s a well-crafted deconstruction of popular culture’s formulaic representations of negotiations in legal contexts.

Another article, “The Womanly Art of Negotiation”, written under a pseudonym, appeared last week in the Chronicle of Higher Education. It recounts the difficulties in negotiating for an academic position while a) female and b) pregnant. It offers thoughts on factors preventing women from being fully effective negotiators, including a tendency to believe that “nice girls don’t demand money”. (Something which this nice girl has never had trouble doing.)

So, are men in fact better negotiators than women? What difference does gender make to the ability to negotiate successfully?

A third article considers these questions. According to Hannah Riley, the author of “When Does Gender Matter in Negotiation? Implications for Public Leadership” (PDF), while it is difficult (and even unwise) to make generalizations about negotiating behavior on the basis of gender alone, her own studies and observations reflect the fact that at the very least women may approach negotiation differently from men.

The effects of gender, according to her theory,

depend systematically on two situational factors: structural ambiguity and gender triggers. Structural ambiguity refers to the clarity of information about the bargaining range and appropriate standards for agreement. With increased ambiguity, parties have to rely more on subjective assessments of the negotiating situation…

In studies of competitive bargaining…I found that when structural ambiguity was high, male negotiators had more optimistic expectations and negotiated higher payoffs than did females in mixed-gender pairs. When ambiguity was low, gender differences faded away.

What Riley also discovered was that when women believed that they were negotiating on behalf of someone else, they tended to ask for more than if they were bargaining for themselves. Riley observed that “The results suggest that the women did not lack confidence in their competitive bargaining ability, but rather felt inhibited about demanding value for themselves.”

Available online for downloading is “Gender as a Situational Phenomenon in Negotiation”, the complete report of the study Riley conducted together with Linda Babcock examining the impact of gender on behavior in and outcomes of negotiation.

Finally, for more information and statistics on gender and negotiation, visit the web site for Women Don’t Ask, the book Babcock authored with Sara Laschever, which discusses negotiation’s gender gap, identifies the challenges women face, and proposes some solutions.

MEDIATION QUOTE OF THE WEEK July 25, 2005

Mediation Quote of the Week

Go placidly amid the noise and haste,
and remember what peace there may be in silence.
As far as possible without surrender
be on good terms with all persons.
Speak your truth quietly and clearly;
and listen to others,
even the dull and the ignorant;
they too have their story.

~ From Desiderata by Max Ehrmann

With thanks and acknowledgment to J.D. Bliss.

BECOMING A MEDIATOR: What you should know before you change careers

Mediation as a career exit strategy for attorneys[Update: since publishing this article, I have since revisited this topic. For information on becoming a mediator, including training and certification, please see "How to become a mediator: five frequently asked questions about training and careers in mediation", as well as "Getting it straight: understanding mediator certification".]

The American Bar Association’s Section of Litigation features a “Question of the Month” which attorneys are invited to respond to. June’s question asked, “Does your current practice match the career expectations you had in law school?”

An overwhelming 79% answered with a resounding “No”. The published comments from respondents reflect concerns about the increasing lack of respect that lawyers endure, the amount of stress generated by the pressure to meet billable hours, and even the incivility of other attorneys.

One respondent observed, “I did not expect the practice of law to be as lucrative as it has been for me, and I did not expect it to rip out my soul,” and another went so far as to say, “I am constantly considering career alternatives. Sometimes I even cast jealous glances at the guy driving the Frito-Lay delivery truck next to me at the stop light.”

As a mediation trainer, I have become accustomed to hearing these kinds of laments from members of the bar. I often meet or get phone calls from attorneys in transition, who see mediation as a way to add new services to an existing practice, or, more typically, are hoping to abandon the practice of law altogether to pursue a different line of work—one which they hope will bring greater (chiefly psychological) rewards.

And speaking as an attorney who left the practice of law a number of years ago and never looked back, mediation can indeed be vastly rewarding and deeply satisfying work.

However, whether you’re an attorney or you come from another profession entirely, you need to complete two important steps before making the transition to ADR:

Do your homework.

And get the best possible training.

Do Your Homework.

You need to understand something about the mediation field and know how realistic your goals are before transitioning to mediation as a new career.

Despite the fact that the world seems full of a seemingly infinite number of disputes, getting parties to the table can be tough. Not all disputes can be mediated for one thing. And for another, mediation still flies below the radar in terms of public awareness. More people today have heard of mediation, which is a good thing, but if there’s a dispute, people tend to call cops or lawyers first, not mediators. There are also a lot of mediators out there, all competing for a limited number of cases—you need to think about how you can distinguish your message from everyone else’s.

So, You Want to be a Mediator?”, an article by James Melamed, co-founder of Mediate.com, is a good place to begin your research. Jim offers plenty of recommendations, including two pieces of advice I like:

First, read everything you can get your hands on about mediation, including Peter Lovenheim’s book, Becoming a Mediator: An Insider’s Guide to Exploring Careers in Mediation, which offers a realistic perspective on careers and job opportunities in the mediation field.

Second, take a mediator to lunch. (Mediators, like everyone else, appreciate a free meal, and they will reward you for your generosity by sharing with you career advice and other pearls of wisdom.) In fact, make it a point to talk to as many mediators as possible, particularly in the practice area you’re interested in, to get as many perspectives and as much information as you can. Mediators can give you practical business advice, talk to you about the state of the field, and offer suggestions on training and education.

Get Training.

If you’re seriously thinking of transitioning to a career in the mediation field, you want to receive the best training possible. It’s an investment in your professional development, so don’t cut corners. Do your research—due diligence will pay off.

I wrote an article (one of my first posts ever) on what to look for in a basic mediation training. Just to boil down and refine somewhat my earlier thoughts, here’s my list of 5 things you should know before signing up for a mediation training:

1. KNOW THE STANDARDS. Know the qualifications standards for mediators in the state(s) you’re planning to practice in. How many hours of basic training are required? What are the requirements for the practice area you’re interested in?

2. KNOW WHAT YOU’RE GETTING. What will the mediation training qualify you to do? Find out what kinds of cases the training will prepare you to mediate and what applicable state standards it will help you meet. And definitely ask what style of mediation you’ll be taught—there are several. Bill Warters and Zena Zumeta have both written on the differences among these models.

3. KNOW WHO THE TRAINERS ARE. Get their bios. Find out what they do in the ADR field. They should be professionals with substantial training and experience, active on committees and professional associations, who have ideally held positions of leadership in the field. Accept no substitutes.

4. KNOW WHAT RESOURCES ARE AVAILABLE WHEN THE TRAINING IS OVER. A mediator’s education doesn’t end when the training is over. Find out what kind of mentoring, support, continuing education, and opportunities to mediate the training organization offers to trainees who have completed a mediation training.

5. KNOW THE HARD QUESTIONS. Be aware that one of the big controversies in the mediation field concerns credentialing and certification.

If a mediation training claims to confer “certification”, you need to find out what that means. Certification may mean something or it may mean nothing. For example, the State of New Hampshire certifies marital mediators who
h

ave completed certified marital mediation training provided by approved programs. Florida and Virginia are other states which have a system of certification for mediators. (My own state, Massachusetts, however, certifies neither mediators nor mediation training programs.)

In addition, just to really confuse things, some professional associations certify mediators. The Massachusetts Council on Family Mediation is one example. In that case what certification by a professional association means is that a practitioner has met requirements that the association has created for certain classes of its members.

To confuse things still further, some mediation training programs claim to offer “certification” trainings when they simply mean that participants receive a certificate of attendance upon successful completion of the training program, nothing more.

* * * * *

A final thought for attorneys who are seeking greater career satisfaction and a way to balance the demands of life and work. There are two resources you should look into:

Stop by the J.D. Bliss blog (motto: “Balancing Life and the Law”), a great web site which offers plenty of useful content, ranging from online resources to the real-life experiences of “Work Life Winners”.

Also, be sure to visit Renaissance Lawyer, featuring links and resources for attorneys looking for deeper meaning and purpose in the work they do.

No matter what you do, in exiting from one career to another, it’s important to plan your strategy carefully. Best of luck to all your career-changers.

Technorati tags: , ,

COMMUNITY MEDIATION IN THE SPOTLIGHT IN MASSACHUSETTS NEWS

Community mediation in the local news for MassachusettsI’ll always have a soft spot in my heart for community mediation. After all, it’s where I acquired my initial training and first experience as a mediator. Working to foster dialogue and build neighborhood relationships at a grassroots level, community mediation programs provide low-cost or pro bono mediation services and offer assistance to under-served and at-risk populations.

That’s why it was gratifying to see two stories in local news this week touting the benefits of community mediation.

The (Springfield, Mass.) Republican reported that the City of Holyoke, Massachusetts, has just announced plans to establish a brand-new community mediation program to resolve neighborhood and family disputes with the help of volunteer mediators. This program has the full support of Holyoke Police Chief Anthony R. Scott and Mayor Michael J. Sullivan, and was inspired by the work of the Holyoke Peace Initiative Committee, which earned Holyoke the All-America City Award in 2002. The program will be funded by the City, and Holyoke is currently seeking additional funding from the National Association for Community Mediation.

Community mediation also received a nice plug by the Boston Globe yesterday in an article on battles between neighbors over boundary issues. Among the experts interviewed for the article was Gail Packer, Executive Director of the Community Dispute Settlement Center (“CDSC”) in Cambridge, Massachusetts, one of the best (if not the best) and most highly respected community mediation programs in the Commonwealth. (CDSC was a finalist for this year’s Cambridge Chamber of Commerce’s Nonprofit of the Year award.)

WORLD'S FIRST ONLINE PEACE UNIVERSITY OFFERS COURSES ON GLOBAL CONFLICT RESOLUTION

World's first online peace university offers courses for Fall Semester 2005Distance learning, particularly through the medium of the Internet, has become an increasingly common feature of the academic landscape.

A new arrival to the distance learning scene is Transcend Peace University, which describes itself as the “world’s first on-line peace university”. Its courses are “designed for government and NGO practitioners, policy makers and students at any level working in the fields of peace, conflict transformation, development and global issues.”

Courses include “Conflict Prevention, Intervention, Reconciliation and Reconstruction,” “Democratization and Development,”, and even “Peace Museums” (a topic I blogged about a couple of months ago).

Applications are being accepted now for the fall semester beginning in October 2005. The application deadline is September 15, 2005. (Please be aware that Transcend is not an accredited, degree-granting institution at this time.)

WINNER TAKE ALL: Games, game theory, and conflict resolution

Games and game theory in addressing conflictGames and game theory crop up frequently as topics in conflict resolution literature. Games, after all, are a great tool for teaching conflict resolution theories and skills, and game theory, which utilizes mathematical formulas to predict and understand complex human behaviors, can help shed light on conflict and collaboration.

I have several links to share with you for game and game theory enthusiasts. First games, then game theory.

Bill Warters, the author of Campus-ADR Tech Blog, has an enviable knack for discovering great web sites. Case in point: Bill recently blogged about the Distributive Justice Interactive Web Site, a fascinating project which examines notions of justice and fairness with respect to the distribution of goods and resources. It includes a game in which players can create their own distribution model. (Click on “enter” at the main page and place your cursor over the image of the gear.) You can also complete a survey, read about theories of distributive justice, or subscribe to the project’s newsletter.

There are some interesting insights into gaming in an essay by Katrina vanden Heuvel, editor of The Nation, which challenges the commonly held belief that video games are vehicles for promoting violence, and describes ways in which games instead are used to teach empathy or build understanding of other cultures.

This essay includes a link to Water Cooler Games, a forum for video games designed for purposes other than entertainment, which in turn leads you down the rabbit’s hole of gaming sites and other articles. This led me to The Better Business Game, in which players wrestle with social and environmental issues in the context of running a business; and the United Nation’s World Food Programme’s Food Force, in which players participate in 6 missions to address hunger in troubled regions.

Let’s turn now to game theory. Although game theory has been used to analyze human behavior in activities that include conflict and cooperation, it has also been utilized to weigh issues of grave consequence in today’s world: terrorism and counterterrorism. Several articles are available online that examine the use of game theory in examining these issues. Among these are:

A recently published article by Ronald D. Fricker, Jr., of the Naval Postgraduate School, asks the question “Game Theory in an Age of Terrorism: How Can Statisticians Contribute?” (Click here for either HTML or PDF format.)

There is also an article by Todd Sandler, “Counterterrorism: A Game-Theoretic Analysis,” which appeared in the April 2005 issue of Journal of Conflict Resolution, which can be downloaded in PDF format by clicking here.

DESTINED TO BECOME A CLASSIC: Blawg Review 15 is a greatest hit

Blawg Review 15 features an eclectic mix of rock and roll and the lawIf you haven’t done so already, stop by and visit Blawg Review #15, hosted at George Lenard’s Employment Blawg. This is one of the best and most creative Blawg Reviews yet. George riffs on song titles from the sixties and seventies, throws in some brilliant graphics, and dishes up an eclectic mix of law-related (and not-so-law-related) links.

(And many thanks to George for saying nice things about this blog in a section of Blawg Review #15 entitled “We Can Work It Out.” Good luck with that summary judgment reply, George.)

MEDIATION QUOTE OF THE WEEK July 18, 2005


We must remember that one determined person can make a significant difference, and that a small group of determined people can change the course of history.

~ Sonia Johnson

WHEN SEEING ISN’T BELIEVING: Optical illusions offer insight into conflict and perception

Thoughts on assumptions, perception, and conflictAs the saying goes, “assume” makes an “ass” out of “u” and “me”. And we make assumptions all the time—it’s how we’re hard-wired as human beings. (And it’s that very human tendency which keeps mediators busy.)

Unfortunately, of course, our assumptions can sometimes be wrong. They may be based on incomplete or inaccurate data. And we often fail to ask questions, believing that we have all the information we need to draw conclusions.

We also tend to trust our senses to gain information about our world, relying upon our sight and our hearing to gather data—data which in turn forms the basis for the inferences we draw about our interactions with each other.

But our perception can fool us.

Gerry Riskin reminds us of this compellingly in his blog, Amazing Firms, Amazing Practices (which is pretty amazing itself). He offers a link to a real mind-bender of an optical illusion courtesy of MIT which makes you realize just how wrong your perception can be no matter how right you think you are.

(Gerry credits Rocketboom with the story—a video blog featuring a new three-minute news or entertainment video daily.)

For more optical illusions, click here for 55 Optical Illusions and Visual Phenomena by Michael Bach, or visit Wikipedia.